It actually came as a shock to some of the self-proclaimed experts that other Middle East nations might prefer peaceful and lucrative trade with Israel to being threatened with nukes by Iran.
Read this article, "Top Biden aide admits to Congress she directed autopen signatures without knowing who gave final approval", https://www.foxnews.com/person/s/alec-schemmel, and the way I interpret her testimony she has admitted to breaking the law. She facilitated the signing of documents that only the president can sign without knowing if the president had approved the document. This is not heresy but the word of the perpetrator herself. If this was past practice then those documents are invalid for the same reason. First, I question the need for "auto pen" at all. Any president who has read the document (or is satisfied as to what it contains) certainly has the time to affix his signature. This is one of those administrative ideas that was inserted to facilitate corruption and must be done away with, and it does not require a Congressional hearing to understand and make that happen. This woman was not a secretary but a director, not an underling but someone who should have known better, admits to having little contact with Biden yet maintains he was mentally competent (how could she even know that?). As to her punishment, she's clearly not innocent but also should not be the scapegoat if others have a similar story to hers. As you trace this "chain of communication and command" from her up to Biden at what point do you realize and consider the incompetence of Biden himself? A strong argument can be made that every link in the chain acted without "competent presidential authority" and therefore are all as guilty as Neera Tanden.
Read this article, "NTSB blames Boeing, FAA in terrifying Alaska Airlines door blowout", https://www.foxbusiness.com/person/c/bonny-chu, and while I suspect this "finding" is hardly a surprise, what I find missing is the names of the actual mechanics who actually worked on the door repair. The "blame" is being placed on management and the oversight agency and none on those who actually did the faulty work. Not only should it be possible to identify everyone who touched this repair, there recording of their work should also be a matter of record, as well as their training for the job they held. This reminds me of the Hudson helicopter incident where the "effort" is more on "systems failure" then the obvious pilots error that occurred. I know it's uncomfortable to acknowledge human error and right to do everything possible to avoid or detect it before damage is done but the day we have 100% assurance of that will never arrive.
Read this article, "Democratic congressman hurls profanity-laced message at Stephen Miller", https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/anders-hagstrom, and obviously I'm not the first to label Mamdani a socialist (I think we can drop the democratic from that name). Clearly some democrats remain sensitive to the truth but again nothing Miller said is remotely backed up by facts or evidence. It's nothing more then school yard name calling. Clearly the comment about immigration being at the heart of the Mamdani victory hits a sore spot with Miller. From day one immigration has been flawed by the failure to ensure (to the extent possible) that everyone entering the country is doing so because they desire the American dream, a republic where capitalism is the economy of choice because it works and is fair to everyone who fully participates. That was largely true early on but has long since been lost and we pay the price every day for allowing that to happen. What was important to our early success has become a nail in our coffin, and the "democrats" (actually socialists) are fighting tooth and nail to close the lid for good and the judges they have managed to install over the decades are helping all they can.
Read this article, "Second Lady Usha Vance opens up about interfaith parenting with Vice President JD Vance", https://www.foxnews.com/person/p/hanna-panreck, found it "interesting" but as a born again believer who accepts Acts 4:12 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." and John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.", and any number of other verses I could cite, I don't understand this cavalier attitude toward religion. It does make a difference what you believe, an eternal difference. The Bible is clear that salvation is by faith in Jesus Christ and nothing more whether "works", Pope, saint, Mary, or even God the Father himself, it is Jesus who took on the form of a man, died for our sins, and was resurrected as proof that he had satisfied the holiness of God. If you understood this truth (not life and death, but eternal life and eternal death) would you expose your children to "options" and hope they make the right choice? I understand that for most people this article will be a "feel good" story but if that's the case they have actually missed the real story.
Read this article, "Obama's former DHS secretary sounds alarm on Iranian sleeper cells, calls it concern of 'highest magnitude'", https://www.foxnews.com/person/c/madison-colombo, and wonder where Johnson was during the four years of Biden's term while he was letting in all of these illegal aliens? You talk about being late to the party. Why would anyone consider that this person has the credentials to be quoted in the news. Understand I'm not affiliated with the media or aware of ethical guidelines for their job, but I also don't think its too much to ask pertinent questions to get the full story before you publish. Consider in the lawsuit against 15 judges, the writer of the article said that Gonzales was deported my mistake or illegally, which is blatantly false. His deportation was "deemed" illegal by a judge (after the fact) whose ruling has been appealed and if justice prevails will not stand. To call the initial deportation illegal is simply not factual and you have to ask why a FOX writer (and editor) would take that step? It contributed nothing to the story other then applying a label to the administration that has not been verified.
Saw this article, "Ella Emhoff feels 'trauma' returning to NYC polling station where she voted for Harris", https://www.foxnews.com/person/w/rachel-wolf, and don't understand how or why this qualifies as news. That being said and not being a NY'er, I now understand that Mamdani, the "democratic" mayoral candidate is actually a socialist but that is becoming less and less of a surprise. The problem is the younger generations no longer know what a socialist is. They divide into two categories, the "haves" who don't think is will matter to them, and the "have nots" who already have their hand out for the freebies that eventually die out in every socialist experiment.
Read this article, "Trump DHS sues entire bench of federal judges in Maryland district court over automatic injunctions", https://www.foxnews.com/person/o/ashley-oliver, and while I don't know what the possible outcomes of this could be I believe it's long overdue. Generally when someone gets sued the repercussion are personal which is a lot different than when SCOTUS overturns a lower court ruling and the judge can simply repeat his or her mistake all over again with the next case. Perhaps this is a tactic that can be applied in every case where the judge replaces the law with opinion. Something to keep a close eye on.
i am hoping the mullahs will meet a terrible end they are a disgrace to the human race
Read this article, "Top Biden aide admits to Congress she directed autopen signatures without knowing who gave final approval", https://www.foxnews.com/person/s/alec-schemmel, and the way I interpret her testimony she has admitted to breaking the law. She facilitated the signing of documents that only the president can sign without knowing if the president had approved the document. This is not heresy but the word of the perpetrator herself. If this was past practice then those documents are invalid for the same reason. First, I question the need for "auto pen" at all. Any president who has read the document (or is satisfied as to what it contains) certainly has the time to affix his signature. This is one of those administrative ideas that was inserted to facilitate corruption and must be done away with, and it does not require a Congressional hearing to understand and make that happen. This woman was not a secretary but a director, not an underling but someone who should have known better, admits to having little contact with Biden yet maintains he was mentally competent (how could she even know that?). As to her punishment, she's clearly not innocent but also should not be the scapegoat if others have a similar story to hers. As you trace this "chain of communication and command" from her up to Biden at what point do you realize and consider the incompetence of Biden himself? A strong argument can be made that every link in the chain acted without "competent presidential authority" and therefore are all as guilty as Neera Tanden.
Read this article, "NTSB blames Boeing, FAA in terrifying Alaska Airlines door blowout", https://www.foxbusiness.com/person/c/bonny-chu, and while I suspect this "finding" is hardly a surprise, what I find missing is the names of the actual mechanics who actually worked on the door repair. The "blame" is being placed on management and the oversight agency and none on those who actually did the faulty work. Not only should it be possible to identify everyone who touched this repair, there recording of their work should also be a matter of record, as well as their training for the job they held. This reminds me of the Hudson helicopter incident where the "effort" is more on "systems failure" then the obvious pilots error that occurred. I know it's uncomfortable to acknowledge human error and right to do everything possible to avoid or detect it before damage is done but the day we have 100% assurance of that will never arrive.
Read this article, "Democratic congressman hurls profanity-laced message at Stephen Miller", https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/anders-hagstrom, and obviously I'm not the first to label Mamdani a socialist (I think we can drop the democratic from that name). Clearly some democrats remain sensitive to the truth but again nothing Miller said is remotely backed up by facts or evidence. It's nothing more then school yard name calling. Clearly the comment about immigration being at the heart of the Mamdani victory hits a sore spot with Miller. From day one immigration has been flawed by the failure to ensure (to the extent possible) that everyone entering the country is doing so because they desire the American dream, a republic where capitalism is the economy of choice because it works and is fair to everyone who fully participates. That was largely true early on but has long since been lost and we pay the price every day for allowing that to happen. What was important to our early success has become a nail in our coffin, and the "democrats" (actually socialists) are fighting tooth and nail to close the lid for good and the judges they have managed to install over the decades are helping all they can.
Read this article, "Second Lady Usha Vance opens up about interfaith parenting with Vice President JD Vance", https://www.foxnews.com/person/p/hanna-panreck, found it "interesting" but as a born again believer who accepts Acts 4:12 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." and John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.", and any number of other verses I could cite, I don't understand this cavalier attitude toward religion. It does make a difference what you believe, an eternal difference. The Bible is clear that salvation is by faith in Jesus Christ and nothing more whether "works", Pope, saint, Mary, or even God the Father himself, it is Jesus who took on the form of a man, died for our sins, and was resurrected as proof that he had satisfied the holiness of God. If you understood this truth (not life and death, but eternal life and eternal death) would you expose your children to "options" and hope they make the right choice? I understand that for most people this article will be a "feel good" story but if that's the case they have actually missed the real story.
Read this article, "Obama's former DHS secretary sounds alarm on Iranian sleeper cells, calls it concern of 'highest magnitude'", https://www.foxnews.com/person/c/madison-colombo, and wonder where Johnson was during the four years of Biden's term while he was letting in all of these illegal aliens? You talk about being late to the party. Why would anyone consider that this person has the credentials to be quoted in the news. Understand I'm not affiliated with the media or aware of ethical guidelines for their job, but I also don't think its too much to ask pertinent questions to get the full story before you publish. Consider in the lawsuit against 15 judges, the writer of the article said that Gonzales was deported my mistake or illegally, which is blatantly false. His deportation was "deemed" illegal by a judge (after the fact) whose ruling has been appealed and if justice prevails will not stand. To call the initial deportation illegal is simply not factual and you have to ask why a FOX writer (and editor) would take that step? It contributed nothing to the story other then applying a label to the administration that has not been verified.
Saw this article, "Ella Emhoff feels 'trauma' returning to NYC polling station where she voted for Harris", https://www.foxnews.com/person/w/rachel-wolf, and don't understand how or why this qualifies as news. That being said and not being a NY'er, I now understand that Mamdani, the "democratic" mayoral candidate is actually a socialist but that is becoming less and less of a surprise. The problem is the younger generations no longer know what a socialist is. They divide into two categories, the "haves" who don't think is will matter to them, and the "have nots" who already have their hand out for the freebies that eventually die out in every socialist experiment.
Read this article, "Trump DHS sues entire bench of federal judges in Maryland district court over automatic injunctions", https://www.foxnews.com/person/o/ashley-oliver, and while I don't know what the possible outcomes of this could be I believe it's long overdue. Generally when someone gets sued the repercussion are personal which is a lot different than when SCOTUS overturns a lower court ruling and the judge can simply repeat his or her mistake all over again with the next case. Perhaps this is a tactic that can be applied in every case where the judge replaces the law with opinion. Something to keep a close eye on.