Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guy Hicklin's avatar

Read this article, "Second Lady Usha Vance opens up about interfaith parenting with Vice President JD Vance", https://www.foxnews.com/person/p/hanna-panreck, found it "interesting" but as a born again believer who accepts Acts 4:12 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." and John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.", and any number of other verses I could cite, I don't understand this cavalier attitude toward religion. It does make a difference what you believe, an eternal difference. The Bible is clear that salvation is by faith in Jesus Christ and nothing more whether "works", Pope, saint, Mary, or even God the Father himself, it is Jesus who took on the form of a man, died for our sins, and was resurrected as proof that he had satisfied the holiness of God. If you understood this truth (not life and death, but eternal life and eternal death) would you expose your children to "options" and hope they make the right choice? I understand that for most people this article will be a "feel good" story but if that's the case they have actually missed the real story.

Expand full comment
Guy Hicklin's avatar

Read this article, "Trump DHS sues entire bench of federal judges in Maryland district court over automatic injunctions", https://www.foxnews.com/person/o/ashley-oliver, and while I don't know what the possible outcomes of this could be I believe it's long overdue. Generally when someone gets sued the repercussion are personal which is a lot different than when SCOTUS overturns a lower court ruling and the judge can simply repeat his or her mistake all over again with the next case. Perhaps this is a tactic that can be applied in every case where the judge replaces the law with opinion. Something to keep a close eye on.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts