Read this article, "DOJ lands legal victory as federal judge allows $800M in grants to be clawed back", https://www.foxnews.com/person/s/stephen-sorace, which represents a real departure in "run of the mill" judicial rulings, where the judge expressed dislike of the administrations action but understanding that it's lawful. That said he did bring up Congressional responsibility for appropriations, which while true, only provides money and general objective for the administration, not how to get the job done. Implementation programs can have the right intention but wrong or inadequate results. DOGE identified many of these and so far only a fraction have been or are being acted on. In this case the judges ruling is correct his opinion about the "claw backs" and Congress is nothing more than that of a private citizen and should not have been expressed as part of his ruling. Another form of judicial interference.
Read this article, "'Bait and switch': Schumer warns of bitter funding fight over GOP cuts plan", https://www.foxnews.com/person/m/alex-miller, and I'm not sure what this is suppose to accomplish, or what bipartisanship Schumer is talking about. The OBBB passed without a single democratic vote, even at that it contains billions that should not be there, hence the need for rescissions. Why would anyone even talk about democrats who didn't vote for the bill not voting for the rescissions, and why would anyone expect this dichotomy to change while Trump is in office. This is one of those article only good for lining the bird gage.
Read this article, "Fired State Dept bureaucrats reportedly using their regime change skills to sabotage Trump", https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/alexander-hall, and you would like to believe that something like this won't happen in a country founded on individual freedom. This is nothing less then insurrection by ex-government employees that have been unsupervised for so long they think they not only "owned the job" they could do anything they want with the job. It will be hard, but I hope the administration (all agencies) recognize that even more important then doing the agency work is purging the agencies of "employees" like these and their followers. This will probably take years but the nation will be better off operating on limited staff then allowing people like this to stay on the job.
It’s hard to believe all the craziness going on right now. From judges trying to change laws and lots of evidence going “missing “, crazies shooting up Border Patrol agents and lefties blaming Trump for the weather, we really need a miracle to keep this country afloat. There’s nothing new under the sun but there sure is a lot of insanity going around. Thanks for shedding some light on the issues!
Read this article, "DOJ lands legal victory as federal judge allows $800M in grants to be clawed back", https://www.foxnews.com/person/s/stephen-sorace, which represents a real departure in "run of the mill" judicial rulings, where the judge expressed dislike of the administrations action but understanding that it's lawful. That said he did bring up Congressional responsibility for appropriations, which while true, only provides money and general objective for the administration, not how to get the job done. Implementation programs can have the right intention but wrong or inadequate results. DOGE identified many of these and so far only a fraction have been or are being acted on. In this case the judges ruling is correct his opinion about the "claw backs" and Congress is nothing more than that of a private citizen and should not have been expressed as part of his ruling. Another form of judicial interference.
Read this article, "'Bait and switch': Schumer warns of bitter funding fight over GOP cuts plan", https://www.foxnews.com/person/m/alex-miller, and I'm not sure what this is suppose to accomplish, or what bipartisanship Schumer is talking about. The OBBB passed without a single democratic vote, even at that it contains billions that should not be there, hence the need for rescissions. Why would anyone even talk about democrats who didn't vote for the bill not voting for the rescissions, and why would anyone expect this dichotomy to change while Trump is in office. This is one of those article only good for lining the bird gage.
Read this article, "Fired State Dept bureaucrats reportedly using their regime change skills to sabotage Trump", https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/alexander-hall, and you would like to believe that something like this won't happen in a country founded on individual freedom. This is nothing less then insurrection by ex-government employees that have been unsupervised for so long they think they not only "owned the job" they could do anything they want with the job. It will be hard, but I hope the administration (all agencies) recognize that even more important then doing the agency work is purging the agencies of "employees" like these and their followers. This will probably take years but the nation will be better off operating on limited staff then allowing people like this to stay on the job.
It’s hard to believe all the craziness going on right now. From judges trying to change laws and lots of evidence going “missing “, crazies shooting up Border Patrol agents and lefties blaming Trump for the weather, we really need a miracle to keep this country afloat. There’s nothing new under the sun but there sure is a lot of insanity going around. Thanks for shedding some light on the issues!